September 2022
September 22nd, 2022
| 
Author: 
A very good article and an amazing website are our shares for this month. xo, Mom
50 Reasons to Give Your Child the COVID Shot
1) Your child wants to play a real-life guinea pig.
2) You’re too busy to research the potential risks of a novel gene therapy that lacks long-term safety data.
Before You Vaccinate Your Child, Consider Five Essential Issues
This article is part of a publishing collaboration between RESCUE and Trial Site News…Read more2 months ago · 97 likes · 3 comments · Mary Beth Pfeiffer
3) You weighed the zero-mortality rate and microscopic risks of serious complications from COVID to children and thought, why not increase the likelihood of being hospitalized by 74 percent, being injured by twenty-five times, and dying by twenty times?
4) You’d like to boost your child’s chances of catching COVID—multiple times.
5) You want to downgrade your child’s natural immunity to antibody-dependent enhancement.
6) You think keeping your child’s vaxxport up-to-date with the latest injection (Germany is encouraging every ninety days—as is Canada) will circumvent the need for masking.
7) You believe informed consent is passé.
Informed Consent To Parents Contemplating COVID-19 Injections For Their Infants and Toddlers
On 2 occasions, mothers reached out to me for help with guidance around the decision to vaccinate their young children against COVID-19. They were deeply knowledgeable about many aspects of the data around the Covid “vaccines” and thus did not want their 2 and 4 year-old daughters respectively to be “vaccinated” (quotes are there because they are not tr…Read more19 days ago · 246 likes · 32 comments · Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
8) You Trust The Experts™—not science.
9) You think life is boring and want to spice it up with some tragedy.
10) You’d like to add to the 54,697 adverse event reports received for children (out of 1,394,703 reports) through August 26, 2022, for conditions such as encephalitis, Bell’s palsy, aneurysms, cerebral hemorrhage, myocarditis, thrombocytopenia, Guillain-Barré syndrome, appendicitis, heart disease, and death.
11) You wish your child could enjoy a life of chronic illness from a progressively damaged immune system.
12) You think your toddler would benefit from periodic seizures.
13) You believe less than a month of efficacy after the second dose is worth giving your teen myocarditis.
14) You would like to go bankrupt covering the medical bills the government is shielding pharmaceutical companies from.
15) You want to keep protecting manufacturers from liability once their emergency use authorizations expire thanks to Reagan’s 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Act, which gives them a pass as long as the product is administered to kids.
16) You think it would be fun if your child developed turbo cancer.
17) You believe becoming paralyzed from the waist down and relying on a feeding tube like Maddie de Garay would be a good life lesson for your kid.
18) You’d like your child to go from looking like this:
… to this:
19) You wish you could feel like this father did after his son got vaxx-induced myocarditis, which comes with a five-year life expectancy.
20) You want your child to experience the adventure of a heart attack.
21) You think playing Russian Roulette with your child’s life is exciting and are already planning the funeral.
22) You want casket manufacturers to sell even more bulk orders of child-sized coffins so they can surpass the 400-percent increase since December 2021 reported by one North American company.
Kat A 🌸 @SaiKate108A Tasmanian funeral director is concerned about the 50% rise in funerals he is undertaking in the last 7 mnths. ‘The previous 10 and a quarter years were very very consistent. But this has been a rapid rise in the last 6 to 7 mnths’ Stats: 16.6% rise in excess deaths in Oz.
August 29th 20222,680 Retweets4,593 Likes
23) You want your child to wind up like three-year-old Ámbar Suárez, thirteen-year-old Jacob Clynick, nineteen-year-old Simone Scott, seventeen-year-old Sean Hartman, and sixteen-year-old Ernesto Ramirez Jr. so you don’t have to worry about paying for college or any other expenses associated with being alive.
24) You think you could use a good, lifelong cry like this Trinidad mom who lost her son:
I just heard of another tragic “unexpected” death. A very fit young mom, with no underlying conditions just dies of a stroke (with massive brain bleeding) leaving two young boys. Nobody realizes it was the COVID vaccine that likely killed her. They just think she died unexpectedly… just bad luck…Read more19 days ago · 901 likes · 963 comments · Steve Kirsch
25) You feel the government has the right to sacrifice your child for the “greater good.”
26) You think Denmark’s decision to stop injecting children based on the data is recklessly scientific.
27) You’re cool with medical tyranny.
28) You’ve decided it’s easier to believe the Big Lie than to acknowledge it’s occurring and do something about it.
29) You’re terrified of being branded the enemy.
30) You’d rather endanger your child than be called an anti-vaxxer, science-denier, conspiracy theorist, or right-wing extremist.
Read the rest here:
https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/50-reasons-to-give-your-child-the?utm_campaign=post_embed
Great website, full on links –
Posted in 
August 2022
Some great articles and a new documentary this month. Stand strong! Love, Mom
Really good article by Dr. Malone about eating organic and why it’s important.
Excellent documentary by Vaccine Choice Canada, Uninformed Consent:
What you need to know about plant based ‘meat’ –
June 2022
Lots of really great articles and videos this month. Links below. xo Mom
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-victory-garden?r=17dxj&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
May 2022
Important article by James Lyons-Weiler,
The News Cycles to Shock and Distract You. Why You Need to Stay Hyperfocused on FDA for One Month. This Month.
As FDA works with Pfizer/Moderna to Find Excuses to Approve of COVID-19 Vaccines for Kids Under 5 (An Impossible Task) we are about to be peppered with distracting news stories designed to distract
| James Lyons-Weiler3 hr ago |
One month ago, I emailed close associates inviting them to join an FDA Watchdog Group bent on keeping a laser-beam-like focus on the FDA as it moves toward reconsidering approval of COVID-19 vaccines for kids under 5 years of age.
I predicted that the news cycles would be peppered with jaw-dropping distracting headlines.
Today’s is “In a stunning breach of confidentiality and secrecy, Politico obtained what it calls a draft of a majority opinion that would strike down Roe v. Wade” (CNN).
IMPORTANT CONNECTION NEXT PARAGRAPH
Don’t be distracted. Stay on focus: The move to approve COVID-19 vaccines for kids under 5 is is necessary for the states to begin to mandate COVID-19 vaccines, and then all vaccines, for all children under the age of 5 – before parents begin comparing notes on vaccines for school entry.
FDA postposed the decision given insufficient (unconvincing) data. But there cannot be any convincing new data that shows individual benefit for kids under five from the COVID-19 vaccines… they do not stop transmission; under any reality-based analysis, kids do not stop COVID-19; kids do not get COVID-19 or die from COVID-19.
What type of evidence of individual benefit could Pfizer/Moderna/FDA cook up in two months’ time? Will they show that individual children have decreased risk of death from COVID-19? No, the vaccines being studied are targeting an extinct virus. Will they show that Will they show that individual children have decreased risk of hospitalization from COVID-19? No. Wil they show decreased transmission in this population? No, Dr. Fantini’s results show INCREASED transmission due to vaccination against Wuhan-1 since the emergence of Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron.Popular RationalismStudy Suggests That Moderna and Pfizer Vaccine Selection Triggered Disease Enhancement in Delta and Its SpreadResearchers at Boston University have reported that individuals vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine have no immunity to more recent variants; in fact, v2 and v3 of the Beta variant had escaped humoral immunity from these vaccines (Full text…Read more4 months ago · 91 likes · 9 comments · James Lyons-Weiler
The FDA will be show data on antibodies. Period. Antibodies against an extinct variant, Wuhan-1.
The participants in the study will likely not be screened for prior immunity to COVID-19 from either natural infection, or from prior infection to viruses that confer cross-protection.
And the study will be adjusted for outcomes-related confounders, if necessary (p-hacking).
And we know that antibodies do not tell the full story.
Students in my Immunology course have created a visually stunning, fact-filled fact sheet showing that antibodies do not tell the entire story of our immune response to COVID-19 or to COVID-19 vaccines.
To sign up to receive information about the Fact Sheet, and how to interact with IPAK-EDU to have information sheets made for your organization, email [email protected] subject line “Fact Sheet Zoom Meeting”. Read more here,
The News Cycles to Shock and Distract You. Why You Need to Stay Hyperfocused on FDA for One Month. This Month.
As FDA works with Pfizer/Moderna to Find Excuses to Approve of COVID-19 Vaccines for Kids Under 5 (An Impossible Task) we are about to be peppered with distracting news stories designed to distract
| James Lyons-Weiler3 hr ago |
One month ago, I emailed close associates inviting them to join an FDA Watchdog Group bent on keeping a laser-beam-like focus on the FDA as it moves toward reconsidering approval of COVID-19 vaccines for kids under 5 years of age.
I predicted that the news cycles would be peppered with jaw-dropping distracting headlines.
Today’s is “In a stunning breach of confidentiality and secrecy, Politico obtained what it calls a draft of a majority opinion that would strike down Roe v. Wade” (CNN).
IMPORTANT CONNECTION NEXT PARAGRAPH
Don’t be distracted. Stay on focus: The move to approve COVID-19 vaccines for kids under 5 is is necessary for the states to begin to mandate COVID-19 vaccines, and then all vaccines, for all children under the age of 5 – before parents begin comparing notes on vaccines for school entry.
FDA postposed the decision given insufficient (unconvincing) data. But there cannot be any convincing new data that shows individual benefit for kids under five from the COVID-19 vaccines… they do not stop transmission; under any reality-based analysis, kids do not stop COVID-19; kids do not get COVID-19 or die from COVID-19.
What type of evidence of individual benefit could Pfizer/Moderna/FDA cook up in two months’ time? Will they show that individual children have decreased risk of death from COVID-19? No, the vaccines being studied are targeting an extinct virus. Will they show that Will they show that individual children have decreased risk of hospitalization from COVID-19? No. Wil they show decreased transmission in this population? No, Dr. Fantini’s results show INCREASED transmission due to vaccination against Wuhan-1 since the emergence of Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron.Popular RationalismStudy Suggests That Moderna and Pfizer Vaccine Selection Triggered Disease Enhancement in Delta and Its SpreadResearchers at Boston University have reported that individuals vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine have no immunity to more recent variants; in fact, v2 and v3 of the Beta variant had escaped humoral immunity from these vaccines (Full text…Read more4 months ago · 91 likes · 9 comments · James Lyons-Weiler
The FDA will be show data on antibodies. Period. Antibodies against an extinct variant, Wuhan-1.
The participants in the study will likely not be screened for prior immunity to COVID-19 from either natural infection, or from prior infection to viruses that confer cross-protection.
And the study will be adjusted for outcomes-related confounders, if necessary (p-hacking).
And we know that antibodies do not tell the full story.
Students in my Immunology course have created a visually stunning, fact-filled fact sheet showing that antibodies do not tell the entire story of our immune response to COVID-19 or to COVID-19 vaccines.
To sign up to receive information about the Fact Sheet, and how to interact with IPAK-EDU to have information sheets made for your organization, email [email protected] subject line “Fact Sheet Zoom Meeting”.
April 2022
It’s long, but the Defeat the Mandate rally in LA on April 10th is really worth watching. https://thehighwire.com/
Some recent articles:
March 2022
Here are some great videos and articles to watch/read this month. Love, Mom
DC Defeat the Mandates event
Here is excellent coverage of the DC event. Worth watching the whole event on TheHighwire.com as well. Sending love to all our truckers! Love, Mom
Joe Rogan interviews Dr. Malone
If you only listen/watch one show this month, (other then TheHighwire.com of course) – listen to this. A brilliant interview. Thank you Joe Rogan for sharing the truth! Happy New Year! Love, Mom
December Newas
If you have any hope that our government agencies actually represent the people (and not the pharmaceutical industry), read this. Mom
FDA Doubles Down: Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until at Least the Year 2096 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data
The fed gov’t gives Pfizer billions in taxpayer money + makes Americans take its product + won’t let Americans sue for harm + shields disclosure of its licensure documents = 1984
A prior post explained that the FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. Literally, a 55-year delay. My firm, on behalf of PHMPT, asked that this information be disclosed in 108 days – the same amount of time it took for the FDA to review and license Pfizer’s vaccine.
The Court ordered the parties to submit briefs in support of their respective positions by December 6, 2021. The FDA’s brief, incredibly, doubles down. It now effectively asks to have until at least 2096 to produce the Pfizer documents. Not a typo. A total of at least 75 years.
Other than producing an initial ~12,000 pages in around two months, the FDA thereafter only wants to commit to producing 500 pages per month. The FDA also disclosed that it actually has approximately at least 451,000 pages to produce.*
Each side gets to file response briefs on December 13, 2021, and then there is oral argument on December 14, 2021 before the Judge. If you want to read the response to the FDA’s position, a copy of the introduction in the brief my firm filed is below. And below that, a downloadable copy of each side’s full briefing is available.
Enjoy. And if you find what you are reading difficult to believe – that is because it is dystopian for the government to give Pfizer billions, mandate Americans to take its product, prohibit Americans from suing for harms, but yet refuse to let Americans see the data underlying its licensure. The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Read more at the link below…
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-doubles-down-asks-federal-judge
(A Study looked at the prevalence of many diseases comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children in a pediatric practice – the results are significant!)
Abstract: We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes. The average total incidence of billed office visits per outcome related to the outcomes were compared across groups (Relative Incidence of Office Visit (RIOV)). RIOV is shown to be more powerful than odds ratio of diagnoses. Full cohort, cumulative incidence analyses, matched for days of care, and matched for family history analyses were conducted across quantiles of vaccine uptake. Increased office visits related to many diagnoses were robust to days-of-care-matched analyses, family history, gender block, age block, and false discovery risk. Many outcomes had high RIOV odds ratios after matching for days-of-care (e.g., anemia (6.334), asthma (3.496), allergic rhinitis (6.479), and sinusitis (3.529), all significant under the Z-test).Developmental disorders were determined to be difficult to study due to extremely low prevalence in the practice, potentially attributable to high rates of vaccine cessation upon adverse events and family history of autoimmunity. Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 0.063% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated. The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder(0.84%) in the cohort is half that of the US national rate (1.69%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate. The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated. Read more at the link below.